Center for Civil Society International ([email protected])
Wed, 4 Dec 1996 14:10:42 -0800 (PST)
CCSI presents excerpts from the Agency for Social Information (ASI) e-mail
information bulletin. Translated from Russian by CCSI volunteer Tom
Sorenson, J.D., Ph.D., Edmonds, Washington, USA. For more information on
how to receive ASI's bulletin regularly, contact:
***************************************************************************
AGENTSTVO SOTSIALNOI INFORMATSII
Kutuzovskyi pr. 22 pod. 14a,
Moscow, 121151
Tel./fax: (095) 249-3989
E-mail: [email protected]
***************************************************************************
N 47
November 19-25, 1996
I
Capital Punishment has Become a Subject of Discussion at Parliamentary Hearings
Parliamentary hearings have been devoted to the issue of declaring a
moratorium on carrying out capital punishment in Russia. Noted lawyers,
representatives of the General Procurator's Office, the Supreme Court of
the Russian Federation, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, deputies from
the State Duma, members of the Russian President's Committee on Pardons,
representatives of religious and social organizations, and journalists
took part.
The views of the participants at the hearings differed. The arguments of
the proponents of a moratorium on capital punishment came down to this:
Capital punishment has no influence on the growth of crime; the number of
judicial errors in carrying out death sentences is very high; a state
that has chosen a democratic course of development should be humane and
educate the younger generation, getting them accustomed to the principles
and norms of international law. The most important and weighty argument
is that Russia took upon itself the obligation of introducing a moratorium
on capital punishment and replacing it with life imprisonment when it
joined the Council of Europe.
The opponents of a moratorium put forward counter-arguments: judicial
errors require not the abolition of the death penalty but the perfection
of the work of inspectors in all areas of jurisprudence, and not all
members of the Council of Europe have refrained from carrying out capital
punishment. The death penalty as the highest form of punishment exists in
94 countries. According to data of the General Procurator's Office, which
came out against a moratorium, the number of deliberate killings per
100,000 people is 22 in Russia but only 6 in Germany and 9 in the U. S.
The polarity of the opinions of the participants reflects Russian public
opinion. Most citizens are law abiding. But the fact that an
overwhelming number of serious crimes remains unresolved and the guilty
often escape responsibility gives rise to a feeling of defenselessness
and injustice. Many have the impression that a moratorium on capital
punishment would protect the criminals and not the victims. Under
conditions of violence, banditry, and terrorism the good intentions of the
defenders of rights can seem incomprehensible and unwarranted to the
majority of the population. The resolution of this complicated and
delicate issue requires gradualism, care, and enormous educational work.
The foundation of a new, law-based society should be built not on emotions
but on principles of humanism, democracy, and the observance of universal
legal norms.
II
The Environmental Movements "In the Name of Life" and
"Greenpeace" call on Residents of Kostroma to Vote Against
the Construction of a Nuclear Power Plant
On Dec. 8 elections will be held for Governor of Kostroma Oblast along
with a referendum on the necessity of building a nuclear power plant on
its territory. This is the first time there has been a referendum in our
country in which local residents will decide the fate of an unfinished
nuclear power plant. It will be considered valid if 50% of the population
takes part in the election.
A bus full of activists from Greenpeace and In The Name Of Life is
currently cruising the oblast. The activists tell the residents of the
damage the construction of the plant would do to the environment of the
Kostroma area. According to activists in the movement, at the present
time the lack of objective information is keenly felt. In the oblast only
radio and television speak with authority. There are few newspapers, and
most of them express the interests of the administration. In this
connection some social organizations held a press conference on Nov. 19
in Moscow the aim of which was, by means of the national media, to call
the local people [of Kostroma] to active participation in the struggle for
the environment
Surveying the area for the construction of the plant began as early as
1976. Construction began in 1982, but in 1990 it was halted under
pressure from the people, who did not want a repeat of Chernobyl. However,
this decision was later reconsidered. Since according to the law "On the
Protection of Nature" nuclear power plants may be built only with the
consent of the local population, irreconcilable opponents of the
construction created the social organization "In the Name of Life" in
1993, and several other environmental organizations began the struggle
over the referendum.
Instead of building a new nuclear power plant, the representatives of the
environmental organizations propose a more effective use of the oblast's
energy resources, which, according to their calculations, would reduce the
need for the plant to zero. The oblast is guaranteed a sufficient energy
supply thanks to its local conventional power plants. Moreover, the
nuclear power plant would not go on line until 2011, and it would not show
a profit until 2020. According to official data, the construction of the
plant would require 2 billion dollars. In the opinion of the
environmental organizations it would require substantially more, since in
the passing years the equipment already constructed has fallen into ruin.
In the words of the co-chairman of "In the Name of Life," even Moscow
could suffer from the construction of the plant, since the water table in
Kostroma Oblast provides water to Moscow as well.
III
Do the Traditions of Orthodoxy Correspond to
the Principles of Alcoholics Anonymous?
On Nov. 21 there was a discussion at the Association of Orthodox
Physicians about the possibility of using the spiritually oriented program
[AA] for the treatment of alcoholism and drug addiction.
The meeting took place at the initiative of the foundation "No to
Alcoholism and Drug Addiction (NADA)." Representatives of the clergy,
doctors, psychologists, and representatives of Alcoholics Anonymous took
part. As a result of the sharp discussion that took place a conclusion
was reached that it is permissible within the position of Orthodoxy to
recommend to people who suffer from alcoholism and drug addiction that
they begin their spiritual renewal in Alcoholics Anonymous. At the same
time, some of the participants, especially from among the clergy, adhered
to the position that this type of social rehabilitation is closer to
Protestant thinking.
Contact telephone for NADA: 126-0451
IV
A Nongovernmental Paper for the Third Sector in Nizhnii Novgorod
Noncommercial organizations in Nizhnii Novgorod now have their own paper.
It is published by the association "Service" with support from the Eurasia
Foundation within the scope of a project on creation of a center for
support of noncommercial organizations. In the first issue of the NCO
Herald there is information on the activities and services of several
Nizhnii Novgorod noncommercial organizations, and an interview about the
cooperation of noncommercial organizations with governmental entities of
one of the most socially active districts of the city, the Moskovskii.
There is also an interview with the chairman of the Committee on Relations
With Society and Social Organizations of the oblast administration. In
addition, the Herald contains a discussi on of the problems of creating a
legislative basis for NCOs as well as offers of information services.
Further information may be obtained by telephone: (8312) 31-3564
(Victoria Nosova).
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sun May 23 1999 - 13:33:53 EDT